The war against terror

Doug:
From the November 19th issue of "Time":
"Capitol Hill sources tell TIME that the department's Office of Legal Counsel is looking into the possibility of setting up a military court to try suspects who wind up being charged, thus enabling prosecuters to avoid many of the niceties of the regular court system. In 1942 the Supreme Court allowed a U.S. military commission to try eight Germans who had landed by submarine in Florida and New York with plans of sabotage. The men were found guilty and six of them were executed. But for now military courts are just a terrorism prosecutor's fantasy..."
Yet even before the magazine hit the news stands fantasy has become reality. Am I the only one worried about entering a slippery slope with regard to protecting basic rights?

Monty Hobbs - Nov 16, 2001 11:27 AM ( 1. )

Email this message to a friend Reply to this message Bookmark this message
Community Coordinator, newsobserver.com and triangle.com

 *



Photo of Author
Posts: 430
Yes

Doug,

Indeed. "War" time often galvanizes people into such a supposed unity against a supposedly easily identifiable enemy that they not only tolerate such erosions, but encourage them.

The Taliban had originally been at least verbally open (how much sincere tehy were is another issue) to turning Osama bin Laden over to an Islamic court, but the U.S. said no. The U.S. wants to be both police and judge on a geopolitical scale. Imagine if that were the case in the courts you and I might be subject to. The police officer who claims you are the murder gets to determine your guilt or innocence and decide on your punishment.

Chris - Nov 16, 2001 05:51 PM ( 1.1 )

Email this message to a friend Delete this message Reply to this message Bookmark this message

n



Photo of Author
Posts: 1191
Not only that. The Taliban also stated that they would be willing to turn Osama bin Laden over to the US if they were presented with evidence linking him to terrorist attacks (not even being specific which terrorist attacks!). Unfortunately the US chose to show its uncommunicative , undemocratic, suppressive, ignorant, bullish, imperialistic attitude. The attitude that got it into trouble in the first place.

It's not the 'western civilisation' that is under attack, it is that US attitude. When islamic culture is endangered by 'westernism', it's clear that fundamentalist extremists will rise.

Chris - Nov 16, 2001 05:59 PM ( 1.1.1 )

Email this message to a friend Delete this message Reply to this message Bookmark this message

n n



Photo of Author
Posts: 1191
I wonder where we would be now in this regard if the US would have elected Ralph Nader rather than this behind the Bush guy.

doug - Nov 16, 2001 06:01 PM ( 1.1.2 )

Email this message to a friend Reply to this message Bookmark this message
Director of Education, WCI

n n



Photo of Author
Posts: 10230
Actually, that is a Taliban lie

Chris writes:

"Not only that. The Taliban also stated that they would be willing to turn Osama bin Laden over to the US if they were presented with evidence linking him to terrorist attacks (not even being specific which terrorist attacks!). Unfortunately the US chose to show its uncommunicative , undemocratic, suppressive, ignorant, bullish, imperialistic attitude. The attitude that got it into trouble in the first place."


It's actually been well documented that the Taliban were just using delaying tactics by suggesting they were willing to turn over bin Laden if they were presented with evidence.

It has come out recently that the U.S. had been negotiating in perfectly good faith for several years now to get bin Laden turned over. Ever since the African embassy bombings. The U.S. even had Taliban people visit Washington. The Taliban did not negotiate in good faith at all. It was all lies.

Say what you will about the U.S., with regards to this particular situation I believe the U.S. is very much in the right.

Let's not fall sway to anti-American propoganda just for the sake of cutting down the U.S.

And it very much is civilization under attack. Any people who would hijack commercial jet-liners and crash them into office buildings really do give up any right to consideration of any kind. Those are not people to be "negotiated" with. They are barbarians.

doug


If you are not part of the solution you are part of the precipitate.

Chris - Nov 16, 2001 07:31 PM ( 1.1.2.1 )

Email this message to a friend Delete this message Reply to this message Bookmark this message

n n n



Photo of Author
Posts: 1191
...the U.S. had been negotiating in perfectly good faith for several years...


I'm happy to hear that - that's good news. However, it's actually besides the point I wanted to make. In regards to what I'm blabing about, it's the perception only that matters. If the Taliban say 'we want to negotiate' and the US say 'No, do what we said or we'll nuke you' (just kidding of course, but you know what I mean), it sends a (possibly even badly translated) message to the members of that other culture, that will fuel extremism.

Let's not fall sway to anti-American propoganda just for the sake of cutting down the U.S.


Just for the record: I love the US. When the USA were formed at the end of the 18th century, its principal of the sovereign individual was inspired by Switzerland and the Swiss constitution of 1848 was inspired by the US constitution. To me, the USA are our only true sister republic. However That doesn't mean that US foreign policies didn't develope their flaws.

The US seems to have a hard time communicating with other cultures. Other cultures misunderstand the US attitude as imperialistic (and you can add all those other adjectives I used above).

It's 'westernism' that led to these attacks - not 'western civilisation'.

Robin Grimes - Nov 17, 2001 12:12 AM ( 2. )

Email this message to a friend Reply to this message Bookmark this message
Smash forehead on keyboard to continue....

 *



Photo of Author
Posts: 138
Do what we say or we will start bombing...

We should have said, 'Do what we say and the bombing will stop… maybe'. The Taliban and these terrorist groups believed, wrongly, that the US would be indecisive and weak when faced with mass murder.

"It's 'westernism' that led to these attacks.. "

Terror is not about culture or religion or even ‘westernism’, it's about power. The ability of a few to control the actions of the many. The only possible answer to terrorism is eradication of the terrorist. The Taliban and Al Quaid forfeited the right to discuss ‘terms of compliance’ when the first terrorist took over the first airplane. There were many other methods available to these people to “fight” westernism. They choose war and now we must all pay the price. They choose how the fight started; we will choose how the fight ends.


Chris - Nov 17, 2001 01:00 AM ( 2.1 )

Email this message to a friend Delete this message Reply to this message Bookmark this message

n



Photo of Author
Posts: 1191
Yes, you don't (and one shouldn't) negotiate with terrorists. But the terrorists are not the problem, they are a symptom. A symptom of the problem caused by the 'westernism' attitude. It's just unfortunate that we have to direct energy towards dealing with symptoms like that, when all it would come down to at the end is just a question of attitude towards other cultures.

doug - Nov 17, 2001 05:51 AM ( 2.1.1 )

Email this message to a friend Reply to this message Bookmark this message
Director of Education, WCI

n n



Photo of Author
Posts: 10230
Chris wrote:

"Yes, you don't (and one shouldn't) negotiate with terrorists. But the terrorists are not the problem, they are a symptom. A symptom of the problem caused by the 'westernism' attitude."


That seems to mysteriously turn events on its head. The problem is the terrorists. Your statement implies that these are people of reason. All evidence suggests they are not interested in civilized solutions, they are interested in wreaking chaos and destroying civilization as part of their religious war.

No foreign policy of the U.S. would satisfy them short of the complete abandonment of Israel and self-destruction.

We are not talking about people succeptible to diplomatic niceties, Chris.

doug


If you are not part of the solution you are part of the precipitate.

Chris - Nov 17, 2001 09:28 AM ( 2.1.1.1 )

Email this message to a friend Delete this message Reply to this message Bookmark this message

n n n



Photo of Author
Posts: 1191
That seems to mysteriously turn events on its head. The problem is the terrorists.


No, it's a symptom. The problem is how a qualified minority of the 'other culture' perceives the US attitude. Of course, there would always be a small fraction of extremists. But if they couldn't build on a qualified minority that misunderstands the US then they would remain passive.

doug - Nov 17, 2001 09:31 AM ( 2.1.1.1.1 )

Email this message to a friend Reply to this message Bookmark this message
Director of Education, WCI

n n n n



Photo of Author
Posts: 10230
If terrorists hijacking jetliners and crashing them into office buildings is not the problem but merely the "symptom" of the problem that what, pray tell, do you imagine the cure to be?

doug


If you are not part of the solution you are part of the precipitate.

Sue - Nov 17, 2001 09:34 AM ( 2.1.1.1.1.1 )

Email this message to a friend Reply to this message Bookmark this message
Director of Community Development, WCI

n n n n n



Photo of Author
Posts: 11830
I think Chris has a point...

While it's certainly true that there's no excusing terrorism or the kind of lack of moral compass that makes flying an airplane into an office building like a cruise missle an acceptable or even honorable thing to do, don't you wonder WHY the folks who did it felt so angry and desperate that they were willing to suicide to get their point across?


Jeff Porten - Nov 25, 2001 01:00 PM ( 2.1.1.1.1.1.1 )

Email this message to a friend Reply to this message Bookmark this message

n n n n n n



Photo of Author
Posts: 1623
don't you wonder WHY the folks who did it felt so angry and desperate that they were willing to suicide to get their point across?


Because they were insane psychopaths?

If there's anything "wrong" with secular humanism, it's this urge to value every opinion, even the clearly lunatic.

Now, if your question is, "why were there Palestineans cheering in the streets afterward," that's a valid question. If your question is, "why are we so quick to ignore that half the world is happy to believe that the attacks were perpetrated by Israel," likewise.

But if you want to understand why killers kill? Sorry, it's enough to say -- lunatic. Evil. Take your pick.

Chris - Nov 17, 2001 09:51 AM ( 2.1.1.1.1.2 )

Email this message to a friend Delete this message Reply to this message Bookmark this message

n n n n n



Photo of Author
Posts: 1191
The cure is to allow al